AMAZON DATA-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE LATEST TEST FORMAT ARE LEADING MATERIALS WITH HIGH PASS RATE

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format Are Leading Materials with High Pass Rate

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format Are Leading Materials with High Pass Rate

Blog Article

Tags: Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format, Data-Engineer-Associate Formal Test, Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Test, Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Exam Cost, Dumps Data-Engineer-Associate Cost

P.S. Free & New Data-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ActualtestPDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1l_EuFLt90GHDRzlDW71IYTb6H5IUhDyj

If you fail Data-Engineer-Associate exam unluckily, don’t worry about it, because we provide full refund for everyone who failed the exam. You can ask for a full refund once you show us your unqualified transcript to our staff. The whole process is time-saving and brief, which would help you pass the next Data-Engineer-Associate Exam successfully. Please contact us through email when you need us. Our purchasing process is designed by the most professional experts, that’s the reason why we can secure your privacy while purchasing our Data-Engineer-Associate test guide.

Do you want to pass your exam by using the latest time? If you do, you can choose the Data-Engineer-Associate study guide of us. We can help you pass the exam just one time. With experienced experts to compile and verify the Data-Engineer-Associate exam dumps, the quality and accuracy can be guaranteed. Therefore, you just need to spend 48 to 72 hours on training, you can pass the exam. In addition, we offer you free demo to have a try before buying Data-Engineer-Associate Study Guide, so that you can know what the complete version is like. Our online and offline chat service stuff will give you reply of all your confusions about the Data-Engineer-Associate exam dumps.

>> Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format <<

Quiz Amazon - Reliable Data-Engineer-Associate - AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Latest Test Format

Certification Data-Engineer-Associate exam on the first attempt. The demand of the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) exam is growing at a rapid pace day by day and almost everyone is planning to pass it so that they can improve themselves for better futures in the ActualtestPDF sector. Data-Engineer-Associate has tried its best to make this learning material the most user-friendly so the applicants don’t face excessive issues.

Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Sample Questions (Q35-Q40):

NEW QUESTION # 35
A data engineer is using Amazon Athena to analyze sales data that is in Amazon S3. The data engineer writes a query to retrieve sales amounts for 2023 for several products from a table named sales_data. However, the query does not return results for all of the products that are in the sales_data table. The data engineer needs to troubleshoot the query to resolve the issue.
The data engineer's original query is as follows:
SELECT product_name, sum(sales_amount)
FROM sales_data
WHERE year = 2023
GROUP BY product_name
How should the data engineer modify the Athena query to meet these requirements?

  • A. Add HAVING sumfsales amount) > 0 after the GROUP BY clause.
  • B. Replace sum(sales amount) with count(*J for the aggregation.
  • C. Remove the GROUP BY clause
  • D. Change WHERE year = 2023 to WHERE extractlyear FROM sales data) = 2023.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The original query does not return results for all of the products because the year column in the sales_data table is not an integer, but a timestamp. Therefore, the WHERE clause does not filter the data correctly, and only returns the products that have a null value for the year column. To fix this, the data engineer should use the extract function to extract the year from the timestamp and compare it with 2023. This way, the query will return the correct results for all of the products in the sales_data table. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant, as they do not address the root cause of the issue. Replacing sum with count does not change the filtering condition, adding HAVING clause does not affect the grouping logic, and removing the GROUP BY clause does not solve the problem of missing products. References:
* Troubleshooting JSON queries - Amazon Athena (Section: JSON related errors)
* When I query a table in Amazon Athena, the TIMESTAMP result is empty (Section: Resolution)
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide (Chapter 7, page 197)


NEW QUESTION # 36
A company maintains multiple extract, transform, and load (ETL) workflows that ingest data from the company's operational databases into an Amazon S3 based data lake. The ETL workflows use AWS Glue and Amazon EMR to process data.
The company wants to improve the existing architecture to provide automated orchestration and to require minimal manual effort.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

  • A. AWS Glue workflows
  • B. Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) workflows
  • C. AWS Lambda functions
  • D. AWS Step Functions tasks

Answer: A

Explanation:
AWS Glue workflows are a feature of AWS Glue that enable you to create and visualize complex ETL pipelines using AWS Glue components, such as crawlers, jobs, triggers, and development endpoints. AWS Glue workflows provide automated orchestration and require minimal manual effort, as they handle dependency resolution, error handling, state management, and resource allocation for your ETL workflows. You can use AWS Glue workflows to ingest data from your operational databases into your Amazon S3 based data lake, and then use AWS Glue and Amazon EMR to process the data in the data lake. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it leverages the serverless and fully managed nature of AWS Glue, and the scalability and flexibility of Amazon EMR12.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
B . AWS Step Functions tasks. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. You can use AWS Step Functions tasks to invoke AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Step Functions state machines to define the logic and flow of your workflows. However, this option would require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write JSON code to define your state machines, handle errors and retries, and monitor the execution history and status of your workflows3.
C . AWS Lambda functions. AWS Lambda is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use AWS Lambda functions to trigger AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use AWS Lambda event sources and destinations to orchestrate the flow of your workflows. However, this option would also require more manual effort than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to write code to implement your business logic, handle errors and retries, and monitor the invocation and execution of your Lambda functions. Moreover, AWS Lambda functions have limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which may affect the performance and scalability of your ETL workflows.
D . Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow (Amazon MWAA) workflows. Amazon MWAA is a managed service that makes it easy to run open source Apache Airflow on AWS. Apache Airflow is a popular tool for creating and managing complex ETL pipelines using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). You can use Amazon MWAA workflows to orchestrate AWS Glue and Amazon EMR jobs as part of your ETL workflows, and use the Airflow web interface to visualize and monitor your workflows. However, this option would have more operational overhead than AWS Glue workflows, as you would need to set up and configure your Amazon MWAA environment, write Python code to define your DAGs, and manage the dependencies and versions of your Airflow plugins and operators.
Reference:
1: AWS Glue Workflows
2: AWS Glue and Amazon EMR
3: AWS Step Functions
: AWS Lambda
: Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow


NEW QUESTION # 37
A telecommunications company collects network usage data throughout each day at a rate of several thousand data points each second. The company runs an application to process the usage data in real time. The company aggregates and stores the data in an Amazon Aurora DB instance.
Sudden drops in network usage usually indicate a network outage. The company must be able to identify sudden drops in network usage so the company can take immediate remedial actions.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST latency?

  • A. Modify the processing application to publish the data to an Amazon Kinesis data stream. Create an Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (previously known as Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) application to detect drops in network usage.
  • B. Replace the Aurora database with an Amazon DynamoDB table. Create an AWS Lambda function to query the DynamoDB table for drops in network usage every minute. Use DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) between the processing application and DynamoDB table.
  • C. Create an AWS Lambda function to query Aurora for drops in network usage. Use Amazon EventBridge to automatically invoke the Lambda function every minute.
  • D. Create an AWS Lambda function within the Database Activity Streams feature of Aurora to detect drops in network usage.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The telecommunications company needs a low-latency solution to detect sudden drops in network usage from real-time data collected throughout the day.
Option B: Modify the processing application to publish the data to an Amazon Kinesis data stream. Create an Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) application to detect drops in network usage.
Using Amazon Kinesis with Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Kinesis Data Analytics) is ideal for real-time stream processing with minimal latency. Flink can analyze the incoming data stream in real-time and detect anomalies, such as sudden drops in usage, which makes it the best fit for this scenario.
Other options (A, C, and D) either introduce unnecessary delays (e.g., querying databases) or do not provide the same real-time, low-latency processing that is critical for this use case.
Reference:
Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for Apache Flink
Amazon Kinesis Documentation


NEW QUESTION # 38
A company receives call logs as Amazon S3 objects that contain sensitive customer information. The company must protect the S3 objects by using encryption. The company must also use encryption keys that only specific employees can access.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST effort?

  • A. Use server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3) to encrypt the objects that contain customer information. Configure an IAM policy that restricts access to the Amazon S3 managed keys that encrypt the objects.
  • B. Use server-side encryption with AWS KMS keys (SSE-KMS) to encrypt the objects that contain customer information. Configure an IAM policy that restricts access to the KMS keys that encrypt the objects.
  • C. Use an AWS CloudHSM cluster to store the encryption keys. Configure the process that writes to Amazon S3 to make calls to CloudHSM to encrypt and decrypt the objects. Deploy an IAM policy that restricts access to the CloudHSM cluster.
  • D. Use server-side encryption with customer-provided keys (SSE-C) to encrypt the objects that contain customer information. Restrict access to the keys that encrypt the objects.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Option C is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least effort because server-side encryption with AWS KMS keys (SSE-KMS) is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys managed by AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS). AWS KMS is a fully managed service that enables you to create and manage encryption keys for your AWS services and applications. AWS KMS also allows you to define granular access policies for your keys, such as who can use them to encrypt and decrypt data, and under what conditions. By using SSE-KMS, you can protect your S3 objects by using encryption keys that only specific employees can access, without having to manage the encryption and decryption process yourself.
Option A is not a good solution because it involves using AWS CloudHSM, which is a service that provides hardware security modules (HSMs) in the AWS Cloud. AWS CloudHSM allows you to generate and use your own encryption keys on dedicated hardware that is compliant with various standards and regulations.
However, AWS CloudHSM is not a fully managed service and requires more effort to set up and maintain than AWS KMS. Moreover, AWS CloudHSM does not integrate with Amazon S3, so you have to configure the process that writes to S3 to make calls to CloudHSM to encrypt and decrypt the objects, which adds complexity and latency to the data protection process.
Option B is not a good solution because it involves using server-side encryption with customer-provided keys (SSE-C), which is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys that you provide and manage yourself. SSE-C requires you to send your encryption key along with each request to upload or retrieve an object. However, SSE-C does not provide any mechanism to restrict access to the keys that encrypt the objects, so you have to implement your own key management and access control system, which adds more effort and risk to the data protection process.
Option D is not a good solution because it involves using server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3), which is a feature that allows you to encrypt data at rest in Amazon S3 using keys that are managed by Amazon S3. SSE-S3 automatically encrypts and decrypts your objects as they are uploaded and downloaded from S3. However, SSE-S3 does not allow you to control who can access the encryption keys or under what conditions. SSE-S3 uses a single encryption key for each S3 bucket, which is shared by all users who have access to the bucket. This means that you cannot restrict access to the keys that encrypt the objects by specific employees, which does not meet the requirements.
References:
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
* Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with AWS KMS-Managed Encryption Keys (SSE- KMS) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* What is AWS Key Management Service? - AWS Key Management Service
* What is AWS CloudHSM? - AWS CloudHSM
* Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with Customer-Provided Encryption Keys (SSE-C) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* Protecting Data Using Server-Side Encryption with Amazon S3-Managed Encryption Keys (SSE-S3) - Amazon Simple Storage Service


NEW QUESTION # 39
A company is migrating its database servers from Amazon EC2 instances that run Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server DB instances. The company's analytics team must export large data elements every day until the migration is complete. The data elements are the result of SQL joins across multiple tables. The data must be in Apache Parquet format. The analytics team must store the data in Amazon S3.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST operationally efficient way?

  • A. Use a SQL query to create a view in the EC2 instance-based SQL Server databases that contains the required data elements. Create and run an AWS Glue crawler to read the view. Create an AWS Glue job that retrieves the data and transfers the data in Parquet format to an S3 bucket. Schedule the AWS Glue job to run every day.
  • B. Schedule SQL Server Agent to run a daily SQL query that selects the desired data elements from the EC2 instance-based SQL Server databases. Configure the query to direct the output .csv objects to an S3 bucket. Create an S3 event that invokes an AWS Lambda function to transform the output format from .csv to Parquet.
  • C. Create a view in the EC2 instance-based SQL Server databases that contains the required data elements.
    Create an AWS Glue job that selects the data directly from the view and transfers the data in Parquet format to an S3 bucket. Schedule the AWS Glue job to run every day.
  • D. Create an AWS Lambda function that queries the EC2 instance-based databases by using Java Database Connectivity (JDBC). Configure the Lambda function to retrieve the required data, transform the data into Parquet format, and transfer the data into an S3 bucket. Use Amazon EventBridge to schedule the Lambda function to run every day.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Option A is the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements because it minimizes the number of steps and services involved in the data export process. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including Amazon S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. By creating a view in the SQL Server databases that contains the required data elements, the AWS Glue job can select the data directly from the view without having to perform any joins or transformations on the source data. The AWS Glue job can then transfer the data in Parquet format to an S3 bucket and run on a daily schedule.
Option B is not operationally efficient because it involves multiple steps and services to export the data. SQL Server Agent is a tool that can run scheduled tasks on SQL Server databases, such as executing SQL queries.
However, SQL Server Agent cannot directly export data to S3, so the query output must be saved as .csv objects on the EC2 instance. Then, an S3 event must be configured to trigger an AWS Lambda function that can transform the .csv objects to Parquet format and upload them to S3. This option adds complexity and latency to the data export process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Option C is not operationally efficient because it introduces an unnecessary step of running an AWS Glue crawler to read the view. An AWS Glue crawler is a service that can scan data sources and create metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. The Data Catalog is a central repository that stores information about the data sources, such as schema, format, and location. However, in this scenario, the schema and format of the data elements are already known and fixed, so there is no need to run a crawler to discover them. The AWS Glue job can directly select the data from the view without using the Data Catalog. Running a crawler adds extra time and cost to the data export process.
Option D is not operationally efficient because it requires custom code and configuration to query the databases and transform the data. An AWS Lambda function is a service that can run code in response to events or triggers, such as Amazon EventBridge. Amazon EventBridge is a service that can connect applications and services with event sources, such as schedules, and route them to targets, such as Lambda functions. However, in this scenario, using a Lambda function to query the databases and transform the data is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining code that uses JDBC to connect to the SQL Server databases, retrieve the required data, convert the data to Parquet format, and transfer the data to S3.
This option also has limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency of the Lambda function, which may affect the performance and reliability of the data export process.
References:
* AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
* AWS Glue Documentation
* Working with Views in AWS Glue
* Converting to Columnar Formats


NEW QUESTION # 40
......

Our website provides you the latest Data-Engineer-Associate practice test with best quality that will lead you to success in obtaining the certification exam. The test engine is more efficient way for anyone to practice our Data-Engineer-Associate Exam PDF and get used to the atmosphere of the formal test. We can guarantee you high passing score once you bought our Data-Engineer-Associate real questions and remember the correct answers.

Data-Engineer-Associate Formal Test: https://www.actualtestpdf.com/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate-practice-exam-dumps.html

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format Our study materials will help you get the according certification you want to have, Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Latest Test Format Everyone has a utopian dream in own heart, Our Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate training materials are required because people want to get succeed in IT field by clearing the certification exam, It is not hard to know that Data-Engineer-Associate study materials not only have better quality than any other study materials, but also have better quality.

Restricting Style Usage, He was Senior Editor of the Microprocessor Report Data-Engineer-Associate and a three-time winnerof the Computer Press Award, Our study materials will help you get the according certification you want to have.

100% Pass Quiz 2025 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate – Trustable Latest Test Format

Everyone has a utopian dream in own heart, Our Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Training Materials are required because people want to get succeed in IT field by clearing the certification exam.

It is not hard to know that Data-Engineer-Associate study materials not only have better quality than any other study materials, but also have better quality, We sincerely hope that you can achieve your dream in the near future by the Data-Engineer-Associate study materials of our company.

DOWNLOAD the newest ActualtestPDF Data-Engineer-Associate PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1l_EuFLt90GHDRzlDW71IYTb6H5IUhDyj

Report this page